OpenAI launches Astra for Law for selected firms
Eligible firms gain a more integrated legal workflow, but UK authority coverage is not established, access and pricing are controlled, and the API is still coming soon.
OpenAI Astra for Law launch ↗A specialist GPT‑6 Astra route with a US legal search index and legal workflow integrations. It is a credible controlled pilot candidate, but UK authority coverage, citation treatment, review time and complete cost remain unverified, so HubAI withholds a score.
Eligible firms gain a more integrated legal workflow, but UK authority coverage is not established, access and pricing are controlled, and the API is still coming soon.
OpenAI Astra for Law launch ↗GPT‑6 Astra Law is designed for eligible law firms piloting source-linked legal research, document analysis and drafting with firm instructions and approved tools. HubAI treats it as a workflow purchase rather than a novelty: the relevant question is whether it produces an acceptable result repeatedly, with controls your team can understand and a cost that remains predictable after the trial ends.
Eligible law firms piloting source-linked legal research, document analysis and drafting with firm instructions and approved tools
reviewable professional work with source, jurisdiction and accountable human judgement intact
Announced legal search coverage is US-focused, not verified UK authority coverage
Use anonymised representative material and have a qualified person identify every correction.
Bring one representative input
Run the same job three times
Measure accepted output and cost
OpenAI says eligible law firms can use Zero Data Retention in the API and ChatGPT Enterprise content is excluded from human review by default. Verify the signed retention, residency, privilege, plugin, connector and model-improvement terms for the exact matter route; do not infer approval from the product name.
Initially available to selected law firms through Trusted Access in ChatGPT and Codex, where the model-picker label is GPT‑6 Astra Law. The planned API identifier is gpt-6-astra-law, but OpenAI says API access is coming soon. Pricing is custom and no public self-service trial is listed.
ChatGPT · Codex · US legal search index · ChatGPT for Word · 26 partner-built legal plugins · Firm instructions and tools
Vendor facts and HubAI opinion are separated. Sponsored placement cannot buy a higher score.
One compact record for price, access, data handling, deployment and the test that must pass before adoption.
OpenAI says eligible law firms can use Zero Data Retention in the API and ChatGPT Enterprise content is excluded from human review by default. Verify the signed retention, residency, privilege, plugin, connector and model-improvement terms for the exact matter route; do not infer approval from the product name.
Initially available to selected law firms through Trusted Access in ChatGPT and Codex, where the model-picker label is GPT‑6 Astra Law. The planned API identifier is gpt-6-astra-law, but OpenAI says API access is coming soon. Pricing is custom and no public self-service trial is listed.
ChatGPT · Codex · US legal search index · ChatGPT for Word · 26 partner-built legal plugins · Firm instructions and tools
Run anonymised UK matters against the firm's authoritative research baseline. Score jurisdiction fit, primary-authority recall, proposition accuracy, currency and negative treatment, unsupported claims, reviewer minutes, permissions and complete cost per accepted output.
HubAI will publish a score only after the same representative tasks have been run against current alternatives. Vendor benchmarks are not treated as an editorial rating.
The subscription price is only the starting point. HubAI evaluates usage limits, failed attempts and the work needed to produce one usable result. Pricing changes frequently, so the structure and verification date matter more than a headline price.
Pricing checked for editorial use on 4 September 2026. Confirm live price, VAT, region, usage rights and cancellation terms with the vendor before purchase.
Model your own usage. HubAI separates subscription cost from retries and human review—without pretending a headline plan price tells the whole story.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
Act as a specialist in legal ai. Ask me three questions before creating the first draft. The outcome I need is: [describe outcome].Create two approaches for [task]. Use this audience: [audience]. Respect these constraints: [constraints]. Explain the trade-off between the two approaches.Review this output against accuracy, tone, privacy, cost and usability. List the changes required before a person should approve it.Do not place confidential, personal or rights-restricted material into GPT‑6 Astra Law until your organisation has reviewed its current terms, retention settings and account controls. AI output can be plausible and still wrong; regulated, financial, legal and employment decisions require qualified human review.
This is HubAI's editorial record, not the vendor's product changelog or a live uptime claim.
Use-case routes, relevant comparisons and alternatives connected to the product profile.
Entry price structure, free or trial route and buyer limitations checked for editorial use.
Verdict, best fit, strengths, limitations, prompts and governance questions structured.
Scores are editorial signals, not a universal winner. Choose around the exact job and run the same proof test.
| Product | HubAI score | Best for | Price structure | Access | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT‑6 Astra Law CURRENT | Test pending | Eligible law firms piloting source-linked legal research, document analysis and drafting with firm instructions and approved tools | Custom pricing through OpenAI Sales; no public standalone price is listed | No public self-service trial; initial ChatGPT and Codex access is limited to selected law firms through Trusted Access | Current profile |
| GOV.UK Redundancy Pay Calculator | 8.8/10 | UK statutory redundancy pay estimates by age, weekly pay and years of service | Free | Free public calculator | Compare → |
| Harvey | 8.7/10 | Large legal and professional-services teams working with controlled legal workflows | Enterprise pricing | Sales-led evaluation | Compare → |
| Spellbook | 8.5/10 | Contract drafting and review inside Microsoft Word | Paid professional plans | Demo or trial request | Compare → |
GPT‑6 Astra Law is best suited to eligible law firms piloting source-linked legal research, document analysis and drafting with firm instructions and approved tools. HubAI's current verdict is: A specialist GPT‑6 Astra route with a US legal search index and legal workflow integrations. It is a credible controlled pilot candidate, but UK authority coverage, citation treatment, review time and complete cost remain unverified, so HubAI withholds a score.
No public self-service trial; initial ChatGPT and Codex access is limited to selected law firms through Trusted Access. Check the official product page before buying because allowances, regions and eligibility can change.
Custom pricing through OpenAI Sales; no public standalone price is listed. The useful comparison is total cost per accepted result, including retries, limits and human correction—not the advertised entry price alone.
Compare products in the same Work + Legal AI shelf against one identical task, acceptance rule and cost window. Focus on reviewable professional work with source, jurisdiction and accountable human judgement intact.
Rate this product and share what really happened. Every review is checked before it appears publicly.
If you used GPT‑6 Astra Law, share its quality, pricing, trial experience and real result. Useful specifics beat empty praise.
Sign in to leave a rating and review.
Sign in to reviewNo approved user reviews yet. Be the first to leave a useful one.