Raw model output can be wrong. Supplier accuracy expectations are not a HubAI benchmark, and a suggested patch is not evidence of a secure release. Enrol only with a named maintainer and a manageable triage queue. Confirm current admission, disclosure and pause rules in the official service documentation. No UK-wide eligibility guarantee, public model API ID or independent HubAI Score is established here.
No sign-in needed. Rate your experience; you can change your vote.
Not yet scored. No completed HubAI same-task test record is published. The supplier information below is separate from independent test results.
Test output accuracy, retries, reviewer effort, data handling and total cost using the pilot below. No completion date is scheduled; a score will require a published method and results.
Free service for accepted projects; maintainer review is a separate cost. · Profile record only; separate pricing check not recorded: 9 October 2026. Currency and UK VAT to confirm.
Pricing freshness: Check date not recorded.
Free scanning can still create a review workload. Decide who will reproduce findings, evaluate suggested changes and communicate confirmed vulnerabilities before enrolling a critical dependency.
Official announcement — 8 October 2026 ↗Anthropic launched an opt-in vulnerability-finding service on 8 October. Accepted open-source projects receive raw model reports; these are not human-validated findings. Maintainers must assess reports and candidate patches before acting.
Maintainer-owned vulnerability triage for accepted open-source projects
accepted, tested code changes with lower cycle time and no increase in escaped defects
Independent same-task test pending
Assign the same bounded repository change with tests and security checks.
Bring one representative input
Run the same job three times
Measure accepted output and cost
Confirm source access, retention, sharing, processing region and approval scope. Supplier controls are not independent security certification.
Case-by-case accepted open-source projects; no standalone model API ID or universal UK admission verified.
Official service workflow
Vendor facts and HubAI opinion are separated. Sponsored placement cannot buy a higher score.
One compact record for price, access, data handling, deployment and the test that must pass before adoption.
Confirm source access, retention, sharing, processing region and approval scope. Supplier controls are not independent security certification.
Case-by-case accepted open-source projects; no standalone model API ID or universal UK admission verified.
Official service workflow
Confirm that a core maintainer controls the enrolment; Name a triage owner and set review capacity; Reproduce findings before classifying severity; Test every patch against the project threat model; Confirm disclosure, pause and data-handling rules
HubAI will publish a score only after the same representative tasks have been run against current alternatives. Vendor benchmarks are not treated as an editorial rating.
The subscription price is only the starting point. HubAI evaluates usage limits, failed attempts and the work needed to produce one usable result. Pricing changes frequently, so the structure and verification date matter more than a headline price.
Separate pricing check date: not recorded. Profile review: 9 October 2026. Confirm live price, VAT, region, usage rights and cancellation terms with the vendor before purchase.
Model your own usage. HubAI separates subscription cost from retries and human review—without pretending a headline plan price tells the whole story.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
Test this job with your own inputs and judge the finished result—not the first draft.
State the evidence for every proposed finding and flag uncertain assumptions.Raw model output can be wrong. Supplier accuracy expectations are not a HubAI benchmark, and a suggested patch is not evidence of a secure release. Enrol only with a named maintainer and a manageable triage queue. Confirm current admission, disclosure and pause rules in the official service documentation. No UK-wide eligibility guarantee, public model API ID or independent HubAI Score is established here.
This is HubAI's editorial record, not the vendor's product changelog or a live uptime claim.
Use-case routes, relevant comparisons and alternatives connected to the product profile.
Entry price structure, free or trial route and buyer limitations checked for editorial use.
Verdict, best fit, strengths, limitations, prompts and governance questions structured.
A measured pilot of long-context coding or reasoning through Meta's hosted API
MFMuse Wonder FullTest pendingEvaluating the higher-capability Muse model inside an eligible coding subscription
MCMuse CodeTest pendingTerminal-based repository work with explicit approval and change review
Scores are editorial signals, not a universal winner. Choose around the exact job and run the same proof test.
| Product | HubAI score | Best for | Price structure | Access | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic OSS Scanner CURRENT | Test pending | Maintainer-owned vulnerability triage for accepted open-source projects | Free service for accepted projects; maintainer review is a separate cost. · Profile record only; separate pricing check not recorded: 9 October 2026. Currency and UK VAT to confirm. | Case-by-case admission; no guaranteed UK acceptance. | Current profile |
| Muse Wonder | Test pending | A measured pilot of long-context coding or reasoning through Meta's hosted API | USD per million tokens: $4 input, $0.20 cached input, $20 output. Web grounding adds $2.50 per 1,000 search queries; no long-context premium is listed. · Recorded check: 14 October 2026. USD list price; UK price/VAT to confirm. | Paid preview API or Muse Code subscription. No unmetered free trial or UK-specific entitlement verified. | Compare → |
| Muse Wonder Full | Test pending | Evaluating the higher-capability Muse model inside an eligible coding subscription | Muse Code Power Usage $50/month or Maximum $200/month, USD list prices. These are subscription prices, not Full API token rates. · Recorded check: 14 October 2026. USD list price; UK price/VAT to confirm. | Subscription-only route; no public pay-as-you-go API or unmetered trial verified. Confirm UK account eligibility before paying. | Compare → |
| Muse Code | Test pending | Terminal-based repository work with explicit approval and change review | USD monthly plans: Everyday $5, High Usage $15, Power Usage $50, Maximum $200. Wonder Full requires one of the upper two plans; verify current usage allowances. · Recorded check: 14 October 2026. USD list price; UK price/VAT to confirm. | Published paid subscriptions; no unlimited free trial or universal UK availability verified. | Compare → |
Anthropic OSS Scanner is best suited to maintainer-owned vulnerability triage for accepted open-source projects. HubAI's current verdict is: Raw model output can be wrong. Supplier accuracy expectations are not a HubAI benchmark, and a suggested patch is not evidence of a secure release. Enrol only with a named maintainer and a manageable triage queue. Confirm current admission, disclosure and pause rules in the official service documentation. No UK-wide eligibility guarantee, public model API ID or independent HubAI Score is established here.
Case-by-case admission; no guaranteed UK acceptance.. Check the official product page before buying because allowances, regions and eligibility can change.
Free service for accepted projects; maintainer review is a separate cost. · Profile record only; separate pricing check not recorded: 9 October 2026. Currency and UK VAT to confirm.. The useful comparison is total cost per accepted result, including retries, limits and human correction—not the advertised entry price alone.
Compare products in the same Code AI shelf against one identical task, acceptance rule and cost window. Focus on accepted, tested code changes with lower cycle time and no increase in escaped defects.
Rate this product and share what really happened. Every review is moderated before it appears publicly. Approval does not independently verify purchase, usage or the reported outcome.
If you used Anthropic OSS Scanner, share its quality, pricing, trial experience and real result. Useful specifics beat empty praise.
Sign in to leave a rating and review.
Sign in to reviewNo approved user reviews yet. Be the first to leave a useful one.