The programme will support independent, open-source evaluations of how AI affects user wellbeing, with direct funding, model access and technical support.

THE BRIEF IN 30 SECONDS

What you need to know

  • $5 million programme with direct funding, model access and technical support
  • Applications close on 21 September 2026
  • Projects should test realistic multi-turn interactions and validate automated graders with humans
01
THE CONTEXT

What Anthropic wants to fund

The call prioritises rigorous evaluations of both harmful model behaviour and excessive refusal. It asks for realistic conversations, suitable clinical or subject-matter expertise and evidence that automated scoring reflects expert human judgement.

02
WHY IT MATTERS

Open work is part of the bargain

Supported research is expected to be open-source. That makes the programme relevant to teams able to produce reusable measures, datasets or evaluation methods rather than private product studies with no public evidence.

03
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

The application window is short

Initial applications close on 21 September. Anthropic says selected applicants will be invited to submit full proposals from 5 October. Applicants should define the harm or wellbeing outcome, test population, human-validation plan and deliverables before submitting.

HUBAI VIEW

Strong proposals need realistic multi-turn tests, relevant subject expertise and human validation—not another synthetic benchmark with no connection to lived outcomes.

Buyer decision signal: Funding deadline · 21 September
BUYER ACTION PLAN

What to verify next

1Define a measurable wellbeing outcome

2Include relevant domain expertise

3Test harms and excessive refusal

4Plan human validation of graders

5Submit before 21 September 2026

Build a side-by-side comparison →
PRIMARY SOURCES

Read the evidence

Capabilities, availability and prices can change. HubAI keeps analysis separate from the underlying official material.

01Anthropic: Wellbeing research grantsOpen source ↗
Corrections & updates

Published and reviewed by the HubAI Intelligence Desk. Material product or policy changes are recorded with an updated timestamp.

Our editorial standard →