Build an approved source pack before drafting.
MEASUREMENT BLUEPRINT · REVIEWED 4 SEPTEMBER 2026
Source-led research to publishable briefing
Can AI reduce research time while keeping citations, uncertainty and editorial accountability visible?
Record a credible baseline.
- 01Research minutes per briefing
- 02Claims with a primary-source citation
- 03Corrections found during editorial review
Four accountable stages.
Extract claims with citations and explicit uncertainty.
Draft from the evidence table, not open-ended model memory.
An editor verifies every material claim against the original source.
Test the role, not the logo.
Product access and pricing change. Read the dated review, confirm supplier terms and run each tool against the same acceptance rules.
MEASURE
Decision metrics
- Citation coverage
- Research time
- Correction rate
- Editor confidence score
STOP / GO CONTROLS
Non-negotiable gates
- No anonymous AI-generated source is treated as evidence.
- Primary sources outrank summaries.
- Publication retains named human accountability.
AFTER THE TEST
Read HubAI methodologyReport the failures as carefully as the gains.
State the sample, dates, people, tool plans, accepted-output definition and correction effort. A useful result can be reproduced; a marketing claim cannot.