Otter.ai86
Fireflies.ai85
← All comparisonsSearchable meeting memory versus connected team workflows
Otter.ai vs Fireflies.ai
A straightforward transcription workspace compared with an integration-led meeting assistant.
OTVSFI
Otter is the simpler meeting memory; Fireflies is the stronger fit when notes must move into CRM and team systems.
DECISION FACTOROtter.aiFireflies.ai
HubAI score8.68.5
Best forMeeting transcription, searchable notes and action summariesTeam meeting capture, summaries, CRM notes and conversation search
Starting costFree; Pro from $16.99 monthlyFree; Pro from $10/seat/mo annually
Free access / trialFree: 300 transcription minutes/monthFree forever plan
Strongest pointUseful free allowanceBroad integrations
Main limitationConsent must be managedBot attendance can be intrusive
NORMALISED SCORECARD
Where each tool wins.
Otter.ai80
Fireflies.ai84
Otter.ai87
Fireflies.ai88
Otter.ai92
Fireflies.ai89
CHOOSE
Otter.ai
✓ Searchable transcripts are the main need.
✓ Simple individual or team adoption matters.
✓ A useful free allowance helps evaluation.
Read Otter.ai reviewCHOOSE
Fireflies.ai
✓ CRM and workflow integrations are central.
✓ Shared conversation intelligence matters.
✓ The team can govern meeting-bot attendance.
Read Fireflies.ai reviewBEFORE YOU BUY
Run this three-step test.
Use your own representative work and record the full cost of reaching an accepted output.
- 01Record the same permitted meeting.
- 02Check names, decisions and assigned actions.
- 03Measure correction time and downstream hand-offs.
HubAI scores are editorial opinions based on the displayed criteria. Pricing and access can change; verify current terms with each vendor. Sponsored placement does not buy a higher score.
Disclosure →